![]() |
|
Volume 14, Number 3 • May-June 1996
|
Table of Contents
|
Subscribe
|
Download pdf
|
Counting CrabsIn 1968, when the Baltimore Gas and Electric (BG&E) Company began construction of the Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, George Abbe began setting crab pots offshore in the Chesapeake Bay. Abbe, a scientist at the Benedict Estuarine Research Center, also set pots up-Bay at Kenwood Beach and three miles down-Bay at Rocky Point. Working with support from BG&E, he wanted to determine if the discharge of heated water from the nuclear plant would affect crab populations. Though support from BG&E has slowed, he is still baiting pots in the same locations, tracking the year-to-year fluctuations of crabs per pot (called catch per unit effort), taking weight and size measurements, and distinguishing between the numbers of males and females. His data set - one of the most comprehensive and long-term measures of crab stocks that researchers in the Chesapeake Bay have - has the added advantage of consistency: he has set pots in the same locations and has only varied the number of days fished during the year. Twenty-eight years of setting pots and more than 113,000 crabs later, here are some of his findings:
Between 1968 and 1980, Abbe's counts averaged 3.6 legal-size crabs per pot, very close to the 3.7 average between 1986 and 1995. However, between 1981 and 1985, the average shot up to 8.1 crabs per pot, a number that was especially high because of the 1981 average of 13. How representative are Abbe's findings for the rest of the Chesapeake Bay? He and Cluney Stagg of the Maryland DNR calculated a number of comparisons with other data - for instance, the annual record of commercial landings in Maryland and Virginia, as well as the statistics that Maryland gets on the harvesting efforts of commercial crabbers. The researchers also compared Abbe's data with the winter dredge survey sponsored by the Chesapeake Bay Stock Assessment Committee. In general, says Stagg, the records from survey data, from commercial catch statistics and from Abbe's records all seem to track.
For the last ten years, Abbe's pots have turned up crab numbers similar to those between 1968 and 1980 - but sizes of males are smaller. "If you look at the percentage of legal crabs that we caught over time, the average size of all males, and the average size of legal males, you see downward trends. To me," he adds, "that says we've put so much effort into the fishery that we're pulling out males as soon as they hit the minimum legal size. We're getting males primarily between five and six inches and males over six inches have declined precipitously." Whether the decline in large males is representative Baywide and what that might imply for the blue crab fishery remains unknown. If the largest male crabs continue to be harvested, could this have an effect on the reproductive capacity of future stocks? So far, there is no consensus for predicting a future decline - surveys of the incoming numbers of young crabs (recruitment) have been steady or rising for the last five years. Meanwhile, Abbe's results are being incorporated into the CBSAC stock assessment effort, and for now at least, Abbe plans to keep catching crabs, and to keep counting them. |
|
|
Top of Page |
|
|
|
Contents of this issue |
Other Issues |
|
|
|
||||
![]() ![]() |
Home •
Search •
Our Program •
Chesapeake Bay
This page was last modified May 24, 2002
|